An Elusive Hymn Writer

I suspect that the title to this Post is a little misleading, but readers will easily grasp what is meant by it.

Only last Lord's Day in Breaking Bread we sang the beautiful hymn that begins with "A mind at perfect peace with God." My habit is to always look to see who wrote the words of or hymns; I am especially pleased if the writer had connections with the Assemblies. I do not denigrate other writers at all, but I am interested in the history of these things. Remember we spend much time in singing, it forms a significant part in our worship. it is lovely to feel an intimacy with the composer.

In many hymn books this hymn is attributed to Catesby Paget who was born in 1868 and "called home" in 1938. It is recorded of him that he "belonged to those known as Plymouth Brethren and engaged in published controversy in response to (mainly Anglican) contemporaries; including both Lord Shaftesbury and Bp. Ryle.

Another stating that this hymn was quoted by Spurgeon in 1869, attribute this lovely hymn to his father, Berkely Thomas Paget, who was married to Sophia Askell Bucknall. Paget was born on November 29th 1809 in London and died on July 16th 1878, in Apsley Guise, Woburn, Bedfordshire.

The Hymnary.org informs us that it is published in 35 Hymnals, but add to the confusion as to Paget, recording his lifetime as 1814-1899.

Stem Publishers merely state it to be a 19th Century hymn.

Finally to exasperate me even more, Hymnal.net lists the hymn as the composition of Horatius Bonar 1808-1889. This is fairly certain to be erroneous.

I cannot close this Post without quoting two of its most beauteous verse; inexplicably omitted by Harold S. Paisley in his book "The Believers Hymn Book Companion." 

                                  So nigh, so very nigh to God,                                                               I cannot nearer be;                                                                             For in the person of His Son,                            I am as near as He.    

                                  So dear, so very dear to God,                                                               More dear I cannot be;                                                                      The love wherewith He loves the Son,                    Such is His love to me. 

An Unusual Word and an Unusual Phrase in the Scriptures

A Word

Sometimes when reading The Word, a word or phrase of Scripture seems to strike a chord within one's heart and mind. It causes me some real delight, and a longing to express it, as cast upon the Spirit of Truth Himself, for He is the Divine Instructor.

Just recently I became aware of a word that had intrigued me before, but sadly I had not "chased after it," if such an expression is suited to this exercise.

Now I make no pretension to any profundity in these thoughts, rather an element of simple joy in my spirit. The Word of God never ceases to amaze; what other book could one read every day of a lifetime? Perish the thought that I would ever cease from its study, or be deprived of its possession by some tyrant; how would I "go on?"

"For this reason I bow my knees to the Father [of our Lord Jesus Christ.]" Ephesians 314.                                                                                                          The emphasis is my own to direct us to that particular word. We own unequivocally that in a soon-coming day, at the name of Jesus, every knee, whether of beings celestial, terrestrial or infernal, all WILL bow the knee to own the Lordship of Jesus Christ to the glory of God. Philippians 2:9-11.          We are familiar with the phrase "to bow the knee," but here it is divinely recorded, "my knees," plural.

I am not suggesting that this is the only occurrence in the Word, but I see yet another wonderful thought unfolded by the Holy Spirit. Paul was not exhibiting subjection here I suggest, (though he was always in subjection to his Lord); nor specifically engaged in worship; but rather he had adopted an attitude beautifully suited to prayer. 

Daniel practised this lovely exercise habitually, "he kneeled on his knees three times a day, and prayed and gave thanks before his God, as he did aforetime." Daniel 6:10.  

In Gethsemane's garden in the depths of His soul's anguish, the Lord Jesus Himself, "fell upon His face," "fell upon the earth," "and kneeling down He prayed." None else could give such confirmation to this thought.         Matthew 26:39; Mark 14:35; Luke 22:41.  

A Phrase

" Making mention of you at my prayers."                                               Ephesians 1:16. [New Translation J.N.D.]

It must be obvious that this is a phrase that is in perfect harmony with the "word" above. It is emphatically suggestive of specific times set aside for prayer. Paul knew the essential need of  consecutive periods of prayer, supplemented by the prayers that constantly emanated from his soul; special times devoted to prayer. He was thus an imitator of his Lord in this necessary practice as a dependent man.

An Explanation

I feel that an explanation for the need to publish my last blog, "but emptied Himself," is perhaps in order. I am aware that this may not convince all who take time to read it, but it will clarify my thoughts regarding what I believe to be a fatal error regarding God's only-begotten Son here in incarnation.

On every occasion of singing the lovely hymn that begins, "Lamb of God our souls adore Thee," written by J.G. Deck, a brother of superlative ability in expressing so many precious truths in his hymns, I have declined to sing the words "Thou didst lay Thy glory by." Hymn 27 Psalms And Hymns and Spiritual Songs 1978.                                                            

And in my desire to find help with the divine disclosure in question, I turned to brethren whom I hold in the highest esteem; brethren who were foremost in teaching the Scriptures; those whom I regard as being the finest teachers of the Word since the Apostles. And I became more and more alarmed by some of the phrases found in their writings. I hasten to add that our grasp of things divine, heavenly, spiritual and eternal, develops over time, just as revelation has been granted to us in increasing measure as we read through the written Word of God in its entirety; and therefore these dear brethren may well have expressed such thoughts differently at a later date. 

But nevertheless J.N.D. writes, "He strips Himself of His own glory;" also, "He laid aside the form of Godhead;" and further, "Leaving the form of God in abeyance."        But Darby did pen these words, "when He was in the form of God, He emptied Himself, through love, of all His outward glory;" that is much in keeping with what I have in mind. 

W.K. uses the phrases, "When about to become a man, He did not carry down the glory and power of Godhead;" "He put in abeyance all His glory."                                    But in so many of his works his defence of the intrinsic deity and impeccable humanity of Christ is unparalleled. His co0mmentary on the Gospel of John is to be treasured.

These are but a few lines from great men of God that cause me to be wary, because even the most erudite, spiritual and godly of men may use words that they might wish they had retracted earlier, or perhaps would express differently.

My purpose is not to condemn these my beloved mentors in the faith, but to relieve my heart of something which continues to burden me, particularly with my failure to express my apprehension of these profound revelations relating to the Person of the Son.

                                                                                                                                                                             

"But emptied Himself"  

"For let this mind be in you [individually] [or, "among you," [collectively] that was also in Christ Jesus. who subsisting in the form of God thought it not a thing to be grasped at to be on equality with God, but emptied Himself. taking a bondman's form, taking His place in the likeness of men, and having been found in figurer as a man, humbled Himself even unto death, and that the death of the cross."

What depths of divine profoundness, it is infinitely surpasses all the mind of man; and is, with difficulty, barely comprehended by the believer. And that is why there is so much controversy surrounding our efforts to apprehend it. Any thoughts as to it will certainly be challenged at best, derided at worst. But that must not deter us from casting ourselves upon the Lord that we may know all the help of the Holy Spirit as our Divine Instructor.

I would like to focus attention upon the phrase at the head of this paper, "emptied Himself." If I cannot explain, find words, to express my understanding of  this phrase, I nevertheless trust that the following statement may convey my poor thought in some suitable measure: He emptied Himself to incarnation. It is in absolute harmony with the context. He speaks clearly of the magnitude of His down-stooping to manhood.

The main thrust of this brief paper is to refute the teaching that Christ "laid aside, set aside, His glory" when He entered this scene. His glory was an intrinsic element of His Person; He could not divest Himself of that which an integral part of His personality. I speak in trembling reverence as human language and my grasp of it is feeble in setting forth divine things. Notice please: "And the Word became flesh, [entered into manhood] and tabernacled among us (and we beheld His glory a glory as of an only-begotten from a father, full of grace and truth."           John 1:14.

I believe that what Charles Wesley wrote "veiled in flesh the Godhead see," is a beautiful expression of this truth. The Lord "out of heaven," veiled His glory, He did not relinquish it. That His "flesh" acted as a veil is incontrovertible, "The new and living way which He has dedicated for us through the veil, that is, His flesh." Hebrews 10:20.    

I remember a well-instructed brother saying on one occasion, referring to this wonderful scripture, "I could no more lay aside my personality than Christ could have laid aside His glory."

The Lord Jesus even as the Son of Man "subsisted in the very form of God," thus not as single attribute or feature of Godhead was relinquished by Him here below. he conjoined His intrinsic deity with His impeccable humanity in one indivisible Person.     Personally He remained in perfect equality with the Father and the Spirit, only in position had He take voluntarily the subject place, "the form of a bondman's form."

This paper is solely my responsibility, I do not claim it is in any way unique, but I alone can be made accountable, none of my fellow brethren. 

Opioid Deaths: A Crisis in England and Wales 

I have very little knowledge when it comes to drug addiction, by grace this awful enemy has never touched my immediate family. I do know of one young lady, a professing believer, the beloved daughter of a couple in Assembly fellowship, and the terrible consequences of this enslavement. It is beyond unbearable to see.

I believe we are still seeing the aftermath of the pandemic, its continual "fall-out" as it has been described. And this only enforces my view that obeying the Government in surrendering our divine right to gather to the Lord's Name, during so protracted a time was the most disobedient act of the responsible Assembly here in this scene, the Church universal. Since when has the Government of any nation had the authority to denounce the will of God for the obedience of His believing people? A prohibition to gather to Christ, as I would speak of it, was deemed unlawful. To excuse our failure in this by reference to Romans 13:1-4 is invalidated by the verdict of the High Court, the very "body" to which we are directed to comply. But far infinitely above that political  "argument," we read in the Word of God, "God must be obeyed rather than man;" Acts 5:29. One such Scripture should suffice; but notice how Peter and John addressed the Council at Jerusalem "If it be righteous before God to listen to you rather than God, judge ye." Acts 4:11. The most compelling of all pertinent scriptures in regard to my interpretation of this contentious issue was spoken by the Lord Jesus Himself and is a wonderful example of His divine wisdom: "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's." Matthew 22:21.

You may well ask what connection the period of the pandemic has to do with the heading of this article. A very relevant question. My simple answer is that we, that is the vast majority of Assembly-based believers, closed our doors, literally, to tens of thousands who were in desperate need. Never during my lifetime, nigh 79 years, has there been such a need and such an opportunity to dispense the love of Christ to the poor, needy, afflicted, and those "ready to perish." Where could the ones who were hungry, cold, sick, sorrowing or enslaved by addiction, an instrument of the evil on, possibly go for compassionate ministry for their bodies, and their never-dying souls?

The answer is practically nowhere, because we had shut up "bowels of mercies," when we shut them out from our halls and rooms, and hid away cowardly from possible contagion. We should be ashamed in the light of the love, grace and mercy that the Saviour has lavished upon us. How we thank our good and great God that His only-begotten Son never concealed Himself from all who sought His blessings, and that He never will.

I close with the quotation that brought about this unburdening of my heart . 

More than 13,000 heroin and opioid deaths have been missed off official statistics in England and Wales, raising concerns about the impact on the government's approach to tackling addiction.

Research from King's College London, shared exclusively with BBC News, found that there were 39,232 opioid-related deaths between 2011 and 2022, more than 50% higher than previously known.

T.W.

As ever I would state that these are my own thoughts alone.

The Dismantling of Family Life in the U.K.

This may appear to be provocative to some, but that is not intentional on my part.

I was reading an article dealing with the obsessive reliance upon social media that characterises so many young people here in the U.K.

The Word of God reveals the mind of God concerning the preciousness of the family relationship; and it is alluded to right from the commencement of Creation. And immediately after the universal flood, mankind was exhorted to "be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth." Genesis 2:24; 8:1.

 This divinely-devised relationship mirrors that of the intimate one enjoyed by the believer: "He came unto His own (things) and His own (people) received Him not. But as many as received Him to them gave He the (right)authority to become children of God, to those who believe on His name."  John 1:11,12.

John's First Epistle is replete with the expression of family connections especially in chapter two. He uses the phrase "children of God" a number of times also.

We are so familiar with the lovely setting forth of the Hebrew Servant, especially as a beautiful type of our Saviour in His unspeakable love for His master, His wife and His children. Exodus 21:5.

I feel this is enough to confirm God's design for family relationships to be held in much honour as pleasing to Him.

To return to the article I referred to at the beginning of this post. The obsession with "social media," which plagues society, (that is a contradiction in itself,) especially the youth of today, has been thoroughly researched. It is not my purpose to extrapolate any statistics, but simply to record that which I find so disturbing in dismantling family ties.

it seems that a vast number of young people spend an inordinate total of hours in their own room in the family home. Spending excessive periods in the use of social media platforms, on their mobile phones and in "gaming." Their parents hardly see them when they return from school, college or the workplace. There is no opportunity for the family to share any kind of loving relationship, nor engage in conversation, as the younger members of the household spend their communications with their peers.

Social media is not inherently evil, but its few benefits are hugely outweighed by its nature to enslave almost anyone; it is not young people exclusively, you only have to walk abroad to see countless folk in constant conversation etc. on their mobile phones as they walk. Often oblivious to all around them; and sometimes rudely remaining on the phone while being served in the shops. it is a national malady. 

I am sufficiently intelligent to realise I am practically ignorant of the "digital world," if that is and acceptable phrase. But what is causing me so much distress is the general disfunction of family life, and no hope of arresting its progress. but I am appealing to my fellow saints to exercise discipline to prevent this sad behaviour from breaking down the family unit. We are in danger of "losing" an entire generation. 

May the Lord grant wisdom to every believing father and mother in order that family life will be characterised by family love, in the Lord.  

Camp Mystic 

Nothing can diminish the horror of the disaster at Camp Mystic in Kerr County, Texas; and only the Father of compassion, the God of all comfort, consolation and encouragement can meet the awful anguish of soul of all the bereaved, most especially parents who lost beloved children. The hearts of all believers go to all who suffered irreplaceable loss, in unreserved sympathy and love in Christ Jesus. Well we know words will never suffice, but behind our words there is the deepest sincerity of each heart. How we long that you might know the peace that surpasses understanding as enfolded in the bosom affections of the God of love. We continue to pray for you, the ones who are left to sorrow.

I need to draw attention to the claim that this camp is a "Christian" camp for girls. The epithet, designation, the title "Christian" is used, bandied about constantly, without any regard as to its true meaning and implications; often without a fragment of  understanding or discernment; Used for so much that exhibits not a single distinguishing mark that would demonstrate that it has a Scriptural basis to at least have some resemblance to that which is Christian in its origin. 

I tentatively looked at their website after a brother had spoken about this appalling  tragedy during the prayer meeting. At that time i knew virtually nothing of the details, but naturally I felt an affinity with all who love Christ.

I will not enter into any details regarding the camp. But I was horrified by what the text that I read, and the photographs I saw. I have three grown-up daughters of my own, and I would never have allowed them to go near that place. I am sorry if this distresses any one who reads this "Post," but it is clearly time we exercised far more discernment when "things" are labelled as being "Christian." 

Just one final thing. I tried hard to learn whether there is a place in North America named "Mystic," or a river ,perhaps. But my research afforded me no help at all. I only wondered, as it seems to me to call a "Christian" camp, "Camp Mystic" is totally inappropriate.

These thoughts are mine alone, no one else has input anything. 

T.W.